%PDF- <> %âãÏÓ endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 28 0 R 29 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 595.5 842.25] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S>> endobj ºaâÚÎΞ-ÌE1ÍØÄ÷{òò2ÿ ÛÖ^ÔÀá TÎ{¦?§®¥kuµùÕ5sLOšuY>endobj 2 0 obj<>endobj 2 0 obj<>endobj 2 0 obj<>endobj 2 0 obj<> endobj 2 0 obj<>endobj 2 0 obj<>es 3 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj<> ox[ 0.000000 0.000000 609.600000 935.600000]/Fi endobj 3 0 obj<> endobj 7 1 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Subtype/Form>> stream
// Show the difference between calling a short js function // relative to a comparable C++ function. // Reports n of calls per second. // Note that JS speed goes up, while cxx speed stays about the same. 'use strict'; const assert = require('assert'); const common = require('../../common.js'); // This fails when we try to open with a different version of node, // which is quite common for benchmarks. so in that case, just // abort quietly. let binding; try { binding = require(`./build/${common.buildType}/binding`); } catch { console.error('misc/function_call.js Binding failed to load'); process.exit(0); } const cxx = binding.hello; let napi_binding; try { napi_binding = require(`./build/${common.buildType}/napi_binding`); } catch { console.error('misc/function_call/index.js NAPI-Binding failed to load'); process.exit(0); } const napi = napi_binding.hello; let c = 0; function js() { return c++; } assert(js() === cxx()); const bench = common.createBenchmark(main, { type: ['js', 'cxx', 'napi'], n: [1e6, 1e7, 5e7] }); function main({ n, type }) { const fn = type === 'cxx' ? cxx : type === 'napi' ? napi : js; bench.start(); for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) { fn(); } bench.end(n); }